Inside vs. Outside Directors: What’s the Difference?

  • By: Josh Palmer
  • September 14, 2022
Inside vs. Outside Directors
Reading Time: 2 minutes

One of the crucial factors to consider when appointing a board of directors is balancing the numbers of outsiders and insiders on your board.

What exactly do “inside” and “outside” directors mean? Understanding their major differences is crucial when considering your board composition. Read on to learn more about the key differences and pros and cons between appointing inside and outside directors to your board of directors

What is an Inside Director?

An inside director is a board member employed with the organization. Examples of inside directors include top executives who engage in the daily management of the company: 

  • Chief operating officer (COO)
  • Chief financial officer (CFO)
  • Chief executive officer (CEO)

Inside directors could also be major shareholders (or their representatives). Because they have direct ties to the company, they have access to inside information and the organization’s inner workings. This knowledge makes them a key element in an organization’s success and comes with a duty to act in the company’s and shareholders’ best interests.

Since inside directors access classified information, strict regulations apply to them regarding securities trading. They cannot trade on insider information that shouldn’t be public. Additionally, the self-interests related to their employment ties with the organization make insiders more vulnerable to conflicts of interest.

What is an Outside Director?

An outside director is a board member who serves on a company’s board, but is neither a stakeholder nor an employee. This director is also called a non-executive board member or an independent director. They receive a retainer fee of cash, benefits, or stock options for serving on the board.

Outside directors don’t engage in the daily management of the organization. Instead, they are heavily involved in policy-making and planning. Like inside directors, they have a fiduciary duty to prioritize the company’s and corporate stakeholders’ best interests. They also monitor executive directors to enhance accountability and ensure the company follows the right path. 

Outside directors have one significant advantage over inside directors. They are considered more objective, and because they don’t have to worry about keeping their job within the organization, they can speak freely and objectively. As a result, they may see the big picture differently than their counterparts. Generally, they are likely to provide unbiased advice and bring external expertise from their personal and professional experience.

Outside directors have disadvantages too. Because they are less involved with the organization they represent, they may lack sufficient information to base their decisions. Moreover, they may face out-of-pocket liability if the company is not adequately insured. 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Board Management Software

The comprehensive blueprint for selecting a results-driven board management vendor.

Ready to upgrade your board’s effectiveness with OnBoard the board intelligence platform? Schedule a demo or request a free trial

About The Author

Josh Palmer
Josh Palmer
Josh Palmer serves as OnBoard's Head of Content. An experienced content creator, his previous roles have spanned numerous industries including B2C and B2B home improvement, healthcare, and software-as-a-service (SaaS). An Indianapolis native and graduate of Indiana University, Palmer currently resides in Fishers, Ind.